vlion: cut of the flammarion woodcut, colored (Default)

... well this has been a long time since I last posted.

Lately I've been pondering the Trump rise a lot. It really bothers me. Not per se because OMG CONSERVATIVE. More because it's shaping the Republican party into some kind of place where white supremacists are having a big voice[1]. I'm not particularly keen on populism and direct democracy - mob behaviour is dumb by default. But the demogogue has a long tradition of shaping the mob to their whims, which is what Trump is doing, and he's taking things in a bad direction. (N.b.: not Nazi-ism. Nor, strictly, 20th century fascism. But very much in the same family tree as fascism. Call it a young second cousin, a 21st century American fascism). Trump and Sanders, however, are essentially the same: radical authoritarian populists - one on the right, one on the left[2].

But the interesting thing is why populism. The Atlantic has a great essay on this - http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/01/the-great-republican-revolt/419118/ - it's worth reading.

A few trends I have observed: the US is largely breaking into four major demographic segments:

  • College educated vs non-college educated. This, unfortunately, has a strong linkage with employment rates in bad times.
  • Rural vs urban.

These axes are not, generally, independent: urban areas have more college-level jobs.

Let me be clear to my urban readers, who grew up urban - rural America is, in many, many ways a different country. If you don't bear that in mind, you will fail to grasp the rationales behind their voting and desires and thus dismiss them as irrational.

As an example:

In the country, guns are a healthy and normal part of life. A common rural activity is to go hunting in the fall; this is a ritual establishing your connection to the land and to your hunting buddies. It affirms your ruralness and your understanding of nature and the way things are without civilization. You are taking part in the pioneer tradition stemming back to the 1600s. Further, the ownership of guns provided directly for your forebears in the tradition to join the Continental Army and serve as an irregular militia.

By controlling and/or denying the right to own and use guns freely, you deny the identity of Being Rural; you deny their freedom to participate in the tradition reaching back to the very foundation of the United States. It is, without any shadow of a doubt, un-American.

Feel free to critique this, of course. It's not per se hewing to reality; it's a genuine cultural myth and ritual. But if you don't grasp the deep linkage of rural life to this myth, you can't grasp the essence of the resentment.

An example:

Let's talk transit and car size. In the rural Rocky Mountain West, it can take between 6 and 12 hours to go between state boundary and state boundary. Any settled area persists in nodules, with thin linkages of roads between them (in the Midwest, there are farms between the town areas). I grew up in a town of ~4000 people; there were 3ish towns in a valley stretching 50 miles, with a total population of maybe 10K - all of these effectively in towns. Winters are often tough: over a foot of snow is normal.

The basic implication is that when you have to go anywhere that isn't in town, you drive. Transit systems subsist on density; there is no density; ergo, no transit system. Next, because driving is a big effort, you want a larger car to store groceries, kids, etc, in order to reduce trips. Because there is a lot of snow, you want something high off the ground (here is where you cross off sedan type cars). This leaves vans, SUVs, and trucks. A SUV is a nicer van in many ways: more windows, more seats. So you're left with SUVs and trucks. Trucks turn out to be very useful if you have to transport goods, something that becomes more needed when you have so much driving to do with fewer stores (and fewer delivery options). That then roughly describes the American rural West automobile distribution: trucks and SUVs, with scattering of other vehicles.

If you want to restrict the SUV, you've then restricted a useful mode of transportation. Hence the pushback. Same for trucks.

Note, of course, that a certain amount of snark from old-timers will occur at the gleaming truck with fancy rims... a good truck is a bit dirty, because you're using it for functionality, not to show off.

Mind you: American carmakers have been driving an image of trucks + the West + cowboys + masculinity for years. That complects the situation.

One of the fundamental grumbles of the rural conservative is that the government is controlling or wanting to control too much: e.g., rules on cars (more expensive cars); rules on guns (assault on identity); rules on development (can't sell my farm and survive); limits on hunting (assault on identity). It's a complex matter, because at the same time, other controls are strongly asserted; e.g., immigration should be controlled.

I'm going to argue this: consistency is a fools game in politics. Everyone asserts their self-interest and identity, arguing for what they believe is the betterment. Consistency is nice, but ultimately, comfort and betterment is desired over consistent application.

That said: let's talk immigration perceptions.

The perception is that there are a lot of illegals, taking vital services that American citizens paid for (they paid for the services, ergo, it's theirs), and these illegals are not paying taxes. The country has issues paying for services[3]; the illegals are burdening the system inappropriately. Therefore, throw the bums out and the country will improve.

Worse, a class of immigrants (Muslims) are known to have blown people up based on their religion. Thus, this class of immigrants needs to be stopped, in case it happens here again (San Bernadino, 9/11). For that matter, let's monitor them and stop them from even showing up.

A certain perception is that the US has filled up: we've settled from sea to shining sea, time to shut the gates and sort ourselves out. We've had a century of interventionism and multiculturalist approaches; this hasn't accomplished much for rural America[4], so let's can it and start over.

One lesson of Trump's success is this: the monied interests of the Republican party have not addressed and served the issues of rural America well. Worse, Murdoch has pushed certain agendas and popularized them; Trump is generally reflecting the moanings of Murdoch's O'Reilly and so forth over the past 15 years. That popular conservative thought has become a monoculture is largely the fault of those hiring the conservative talking heads.

A long-running theme in American thought is a distrust of intellectuals. I don't have time or sources to work through that; but it is playing out strongly in the Trumpian & populist discourse.

So we have a multiheaded situation:

  • Rural needs are not usually not understood by the urban demographic and dismissed as rubes.
  • Republican thought has become a popular monoculture via Murdoch.
  • Trump has taken the Fox pieces, run with them, and is addressing the rural complaints squarely.
  • Trump and his supporters are promoting a Strongman view of government

A final commentary - rural populism is going to be a force in the US until the rural places finally collapse or people in government address their needs head on. My reckoning is that urban populism ala Sanders will remain until the people complaining have their needs addressed.

Welcome to the 2016 elections.


[1] It's been a common and untrue canard among liberals to assert that the US Republican party has been this for years. That has generally been wrong, except for the far fringe. It's more correct to assert that the Republicans have not ejected their fringe, who happen to agree & vote with with the Republicans on things like gun control.

[2] I've seen a lot of libertarian types roll to Sanders. Does not make sense, given democratic socialism's big government approaches. But oookay.

[3] This is factual, sadly.

[4] suicide rates for rural Americans are a growing problem. Not to mention meth, alcoholism, etc. Globalization has largely meant "send farm, mine, factory overseas and lose job" in the public perception.

Huh.

Jan. 25th, 2014 11:05 am
vlion: cut of the flammarion woodcut, colored (Default)
Fwuuuuuh?

Legislature in Oklahoma banning all marriage?

http://www.news9.com/story/24543033/lawmakers-consider-preventing-all-marriage-in-oklahoma


I think we're on the lulz train, folks, and it don't stop for nuffin. EVER.

full text copied for posterity )

Moving in

Jun. 20th, 2013 11:00 pm
vlion: cut of the flammarion woodcut, colored (Default)
One thing I like to do is keep an eye on the politicians that my district sends to Washington DC. So I followed them on Twitter tonight. Should be interesting watching what they have to say.

Also need to figure out the B'ham city council/mayor newsfeeds. I really having been realizing the importance of *local* government lately.
vlion: (longcat vs tacgnol.)
Well, Obama's got a tuned-in media team (or is tuned-in himself).

https://my.barackobama.com/page/s/reddit


Lots of AMAs these days from celebs and personalities. But, still fun to see.
vlion: cut of the flammarion woodcut, colored (Default)
I'd like to recommend Myth of a Christian Nation, by Boyd.

From a theological/historical stance Boyd describes a number of reasons why Christians ought not to be dorking around with politics. Many, many of the points he made were very good. He lucidly describes and articulates many of the points I've been making for years. I would highly recommend this book to fellow Christians or if you are not a Christian, but have an interest in Christian theology.

The book is largely written from an Anabaptist perspective, which was also known as part of the Radical Reformation. Anabaptists were unique in that they were generally persecuted by both the "usual" Reformation (also known as the Magisterial Reformation) and the Roman Catholics. This has given their theology a very distinctive flavor - they were acutely aware what happens when a church - any church - gets its hands on the reins of power, and this awareness diffuses out into their approach to life. Today, the most "practicing" Anabaptist group are the Mennonites; the Shakers and the Amish were more rigid and have largely seemed to focus more on outward refuge from the world than the inner life initially preached.
vlion: cut of the flammarion woodcut, colored (Default)
I like State of the Unions.

I particularly like this statement Obama made.


We need to teach our kids that it’s not just the winner of the Super Bowl who deserves to be celebrated, but the winner of the science fair; that success is not a function of fame or PR, but of hard work and discipline.

---Barack Obama, SoTU 2011

Urgh.

Aug. 30th, 2010 06:54 pm
vlion: cut of the flammarion woodcut, colored (Default)
Data found tonight from the US department of Labor Statistics

Read more... )

Profile

vlion: cut of the flammarion woodcut, colored (Default)
vlion

February 2017

S M T W T F S
   12 34
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728    

Style Credit

Syndicate

RSS Atom
Page generated Jun. 24th, 2017 05:19 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

Most Popular Tags